So my intentions were to recap my last two weeks as ATR but then I find this.
The New York Daily News tells us about the 1.5 million dollar, 30 second spot that our leadership has come up with to celebrate “the passion and promise in our public schools”.
Did they forget to mention a few things?
Those of us who are in the trenches say YES, a resounding YES!
Those of us being bullied and denigrated by our administrators say YES!
Those of us having been found Ineffective by a vengeful and incompetent administrator say YES!
Those of us having been made ATRs for no reason whatsoever say YES! A resounding YES!
Where are those millions when we spend our own money to buy supplies that our measly Teacher's Choice does not cover? Oh wait, the Unity Union is using it for a 30 second slot on TV. Where are those millions when we could use them to hire better lawyers to assist the membership when they are brought up on 3020 made up, trumped up charges? You know where they are!
They have no shame. They parade themselves on TV and show the audience that all is good with our schools today. That our students love taking all these extra tests that show nothing. That our teachers are happy with an evaluation system that is made to get the strong teachers out. The teachers who are creative and don't follow a script to get the most out of the students. The teachers who build rapport and discipline with their kids.
There are many, many more things that they forget to mention, many.
No, they have no shame and it embarrases me to be lumped together with our Unity Union.
Showing posts with label DOE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DOE. Show all posts
Saturday, September 26, 2015
Wednesday, September 23, 2015
An Example
Sometimes we need to look to others to help us figure out the best course of action. This holds true when it comes to unions, especially unions. I remember when the fire fighters, (love them, God bless them) stood firm and waited till they were given a fair contract. Ditto for the police force. However, the teachers' union doesn't follow suit.
If anything, I would say, (I do say) that we were sold out and that when the contract was ratified the membership was not consulted. Do you remember voting to ratify the contract? I certainly was not included in that decision.
Well, right now we have to live with the choice made for us and wait for the tiny little increments we will be receiving. Yeah, more like bread crumbs, if you ask me. Sold out, is how I feel and so does everyone I speak to. The contract shows how little our union thinks about its members and how much they think about lining their pockets.
So, I'm looking to Seattle teachers for a little guidance. Maybe a model for when I am part of the new union leadership, Solidarity. They do say, "Imitation is the highest form of flattery!"
First of all, let me set it up for you if you haven't heard.
The talks broke down and they announced on their website, "parents and students (should ) prepare for something not seen here in a generation". Yes, they are passionate and willing to make sacrifices even in the face of being fined for their action.
Hear that, New York...
On they went and their strike lasted until Tuesday, September 15, 2015, 6 PM, P.S.T, when the district and teachers' union bargaining team reached a tentative agreement. They voted to recommend its ratification and end the strike. School would start on Thursday for Seattle students, but the strike wouldn't be officially over until Sunday, when the full union membership would have a chance to vote on the contract agreement.
Hear that, New York...
... full union membership has a chance to vote on the contract agreement...
Membership as part of the final decision... isn't this the way it's supposed to be? I have yet to vote on a contract and ladies and gentlemen, I have been around since 1987!
On this past Sunday, the full membership of Seattle Education Association overwhelmingly voted to accept a new three-year contract with the Seattle School District after months of negotiations and six days of striking. Sure some of what they fought for had give- backs, like their salary increase came with a longer school day for students, but they fought for their beliefs. They stood firm and took on Goliath. That's what a union does.
A union supports and fights for its membership.
A union keeps track of the rising cost of living and makes sure to take it into account when it's time to talk again.
A union does not allow anyone to speak ill of one of its members. No Matter What!
A union does not play politics on the backs of the people who voted them into their positions. They keep in mind, I Am a Representative Of Many!
A Union...
A union...
A Un... I could go on...
It is time for a change. As I walk the hallways of the school I'm in, you can hear it. As I sit in the Teachers' lounge, it is a topic of conversation. Teachers want a change. They are dissatisfied and morale is at its lowest. This is not our doing. This is the result of a leadership who puts itself first. A leadership who plays politics for its own betterment. A leadership whose president belongs to so many different councils and groups that he has forgotten that this is his primary job and that we put him there. Well, not me.
This upcoming June will be the first time that I will vote with much delight and full of hope.
I will be voting Solidarity all the way! Because as their slogan says, "Hope is coming!"
If anything, I would say, (I do say) that we were sold out and that when the contract was ratified the membership was not consulted. Do you remember voting to ratify the contract? I certainly was not included in that decision.
Well, right now we have to live with the choice made for us and wait for the tiny little increments we will be receiving. Yeah, more like bread crumbs, if you ask me. Sold out, is how I feel and so does everyone I speak to. The contract shows how little our union thinks about its members and how much they think about lining their pockets.
So, I'm looking to Seattle teachers for a little guidance. Maybe a model for when I am part of the new union leadership, Solidarity. They do say, "Imitation is the highest form of flattery!"
First of all, let me set it up for you if you haven't heard.
- Having the old contract expired, Seattle's teachers hadn't received a cost of living raise in six years.
- the district wants to increase the length of the school day by 20 minutes without adequately compensating teachers for the extra time.
- The teachers are seeking to address racial and social inequality in Seattle schools by setting up equity teams to study achievement gaps and discipline trends in 60 of the district's 97 schools
- Teachers also want to ensure that every elementary school student gets at least 30 minutes of time to play outside the classroom.
- Teachers also wish to address over-testing by imposing limits on the number of tests students take and increasing teacher involvement in deciding which tests are given and how they are used.
The talks broke down and they announced on their website, "parents and students (should ) prepare for something not seen here in a generation". Yes, they are passionate and willing to make sacrifices even in the face of being fined for their action.
Hear that, New York...
On they went and their strike lasted until Tuesday, September 15, 2015, 6 PM, P.S.T, when the district and teachers' union bargaining team reached a tentative agreement. They voted to recommend its ratification and end the strike. School would start on Thursday for Seattle students, but the strike wouldn't be officially over until Sunday, when the full union membership would have a chance to vote on the contract agreement.
Hear that, New York...
... full union membership has a chance to vote on the contract agreement...
Membership as part of the final decision... isn't this the way it's supposed to be? I have yet to vote on a contract and ladies and gentlemen, I have been around since 1987!
On this past Sunday, the full membership of Seattle Education Association overwhelmingly voted to accept a new three-year contract with the Seattle School District after months of negotiations and six days of striking. Sure some of what they fought for had give- backs, like their salary increase came with a longer school day for students, but they fought for their beliefs. They stood firm and took on Goliath. That's what a union does.
A union supports and fights for its membership.
A union keeps track of the rising cost of living and makes sure to take it into account when it's time to talk again.
A union does not allow anyone to speak ill of one of its members. No Matter What!
A union does not play politics on the backs of the people who voted them into their positions. They keep in mind, I Am a Representative Of Many!
A Union...
A union...
A Un... I could go on...
It is time for a change. As I walk the hallways of the school I'm in, you can hear it. As I sit in the Teachers' lounge, it is a topic of conversation. Teachers want a change. They are dissatisfied and morale is at its lowest. This is not our doing. This is the result of a leadership who puts itself first. A leadership who plays politics for its own betterment. A leadership whose president belongs to so many different councils and groups that he has forgotten that this is his primary job and that we put him there. Well, not me.
This upcoming June will be the first time that I will vote with much delight and full of hope.
I will be voting Solidarity all the way! Because as their slogan says, "Hope is coming!"
Labels:
abuse of power,
contracts,
DOE,
Michael Mulgrew,
money,
mulgrew,
NYC,
UFT
Thursday, July 2, 2015
She finally did it! The principal rated me ineffective in her part of the evaluation. I am beside myself and wonder what this will do to my final evaluation.
Last year, not really being familiar with the numbers, she rated me developing. At the end it turned into effective and highly effective.
This year, in her own words, she understood the way the numbers weighed and their impact. So, she had to rate me down to make sure I don't receive effective again. I'm not stupid. I read right through her statement.
I have spoken to the union, and continue research on my options (if any). I am gathering all of my papers and creating a timeline to file harassment. I have 4 years worth of papers to go through! Thank God it's summer!!!
I am still awaiting the determination of EEOC. Although 3 teachers claimed they would also file discrimination charges against her, I am only certain of one who did the same and he too is awaiting the result.
I hate waiting! Not a good trait to possess!
Anyway, she again "excessed" me from the school. This I don't get, because she tried this 2 years ago and when she did this, it was overturned by the superintendent. I have 27 years going on 28. Which superintendent will okay this excess? I have the most experience but she had left her options open by never appointing me in the High School certificate!!!
She is cunning! That I have to give her. But, she is transparent! Too transparent. Maybe she wants me to know that she does what she does. That's a special kind of evil, one I had never experienced until I came to this school. And, finally, I don't care.
I work at XXX Academy! Tune in later...
Saturday, May 16, 2015
The DOE
I have been downtown three times the past four weeks: step two grievance, EEOC, and to answer allegations. Yup, it's been quite a ride. I'm resilient. I fall and get up no matter what.
I am up.
I have several APPRs waiting to be reviewed. The last one hasn't been acknowledged by the principal yet. And, it was given to her two weeks ago. That's OK.
Like I said, I am up.
I thought that simply following her misguided teaching "recommendations" would keep her off my back, but that has not been the case. They still say I am not doing it correctly. The other day, the ELA coach gave me feedback on how to write my assessment so they would get it. Well, I did.
Their response was comical. "This is not an assessment. You must follow the LT (learning target) and CFS (criteria for success) and connect it to the task. Then, mumbo, jumbo, hippity hop..."
So, I told the coach and he shook his head.
Two network coaches came in to do PD. They questioned why we wrote our LTs the way we did.
"This is how she wants them."
Coach: "These are not LTs." HAH...
But, God don't like ugly. The superintendent came in to rate her on Thursday. She was quite the arrogant bitch. (No wonder she has never responded to my letters. I can write an entire post just on that visit.)
She questioned everything in every classroom she visited. Then said, "I saw nothing today that is more than developing." HAH...
Well, everything she saw follows what the principal wants to see in every classroom. We are following her format to a T.
"DEVELOPING."
It's been a rough year, but it's almost over. I'm desensitized and don't seem to care any more. But, I am up.
I am up.
I have several APPRs waiting to be reviewed. The last one hasn't been acknowledged by the principal yet. And, it was given to her two weeks ago. That's OK.
Like I said, I am up.
I thought that simply following her misguided teaching "recommendations" would keep her off my back, but that has not been the case. They still say I am not doing it correctly. The other day, the ELA coach gave me feedback on how to write my assessment so they would get it. Well, I did.
Their response was comical. "This is not an assessment. You must follow the LT (learning target) and CFS (criteria for success) and connect it to the task. Then, mumbo, jumbo, hippity hop..."
So, I told the coach and he shook his head.
Two network coaches came in to do PD. They questioned why we wrote our LTs the way we did.
"This is how she wants them."
Coach: "These are not LTs." HAH...
But, God don't like ugly. The superintendent came in to rate her on Thursday. She was quite the arrogant bitch. (No wonder she has never responded to my letters. I can write an entire post just on that visit.)
She questioned everything in every classroom she visited. Then said, "I saw nothing today that is more than developing." HAH...
Well, everything she saw follows what the principal wants to see in every classroom. We are following her format to a T.
"DEVELOPING."
It's been a rough year, but it's almost over. I'm desensitized and don't seem to care any more. But, I am up.
Thursday, April 2, 2015
I Didn't Think It Could Be Possible
Who am I kidding: politicians with big backers get what they want. What I don't understand is, how can something that I have been working for the past 27 years of my life, something I have gone to school for and are considered "Highly qualified" doing can just be taken from me.
I worked hard to be tenured in NYC and now that I'm about to retire, Cuomo says I can lose it in the blink of an eye. Those of you following my blog know that I don't have a sympathetic administrator. In fact, I'm sure the only thing she is upset about is losing a great portion of her say when it comes to observing her teachers.
But that aside, two ineffective ratings and they can move to fire you! Where do these people live? Do they not understand that the problem is systemic?
And, this is not about firing teachers who are not good for education. This is about firing teachers who cost too much.
My school is brimming with Teach for America and Fellows, all of which are under 25, inexperienced, come from the Midwest, and cost half as much as I do. They are sheep and have no clue. The principal loves them and constantly sings their praises. She has gone as far as to send experienced teachers to get tips from them. I am living a farce.
Here are two articles that are a must read.
Budget Proposals
Here Come the Independent Evaluators
I worked hard to be tenured in NYC and now that I'm about to retire, Cuomo says I can lose it in the blink of an eye. Those of you following my blog know that I don't have a sympathetic administrator. In fact, I'm sure the only thing she is upset about is losing a great portion of her say when it comes to observing her teachers.
But that aside, two ineffective ratings and they can move to fire you! Where do these people live? Do they not understand that the problem is systemic?
And, this is not about firing teachers who are not good for education. This is about firing teachers who cost too much.
My school is brimming with Teach for America and Fellows, all of which are under 25, inexperienced, come from the Midwest, and cost half as much as I do. They are sheep and have no clue. The principal loves them and constantly sings their praises. She has gone as far as to send experienced teachers to get tips from them. I am living a farce.
Here are two articles that are a must read.
Budget Proposals
Here Come the Independent Evaluators
Thursday, February 19, 2015
Here we go.....
I just couldn't believe my eyes.
I thought things couldn't get worse.
Our AP had kind of alluded to this but we hadn't really heard the details. Thanks to the good ol'e New York Post for informing us.
Mr. de Blasio has just come up with another solution to better our NYC schools, as if our classrooms needed this.
Alas, our students will be receiving less disciplinary actions, all in the name of equality. He claims he is doing this in the name of equality. I'm sorry but this has nothing to do with color or ethnicity. Here again, he is trying to use the race card in his latest debacle. And in doing this, he will also keep the schools safe.
What, youre kidding me right?
Our classrooms are already a mess, but let's make it harder on the kids who come in to actually learn.
It is not like every time a student acts out he/she gets suspended. Nope.
And it is not like every time a student calls me a "Bitch!" or tells me to go "Fuck off" there are consequences. "He/she is having a hard day," says my AP sheepishly,
Let us now show how little we care about the kids who come in willing to learn, respect adults, and want to graduate and become productive in our society.
"They'll be fine, right?"
Well, not really, because as it stands these students lose a lot of time to the clowns, and the "playas".
They fall behind when teachers find themselves having to repeat themselves because there are five kids in the back who couldn't care less and have no respect for themselves or anyone else, for that matter.
They lose a lot of time every time a fight breaks out in the classroom and the kids, having faced no consequences, are right back in the classroom to start another fight 10 minutes later.
You get the picture.
And now he will drastically reduce punishments!!!
And all in the name of Blacks and Latinos!!!
Kudos, Mr. Mayor, you have done it again. You are a brilliant man. Just like your take on cellphones in school (he believes kids should have them), you have no idea what is happening in our schools.
Are you letting your teenage son help you dictate policy? Sounds like it to me.
I thought things couldn't get worse.
Our AP had kind of alluded to this but we hadn't really heard the details. Thanks to the good ol'e New York Post for informing us.
Mr. de Blasio has just come up with another solution to better our NYC schools, as if our classrooms needed this.
Alas, our students will be receiving less disciplinary actions, all in the name of equality. He claims he is doing this in the name of equality. I'm sorry but this has nothing to do with color or ethnicity. Here again, he is trying to use the race card in his latest debacle. And in doing this, he will also keep the schools safe.
What, youre kidding me right?
Our classrooms are already a mess, but let's make it harder on the kids who come in to actually learn.
It is not like every time a student acts out he/she gets suspended. Nope.
And it is not like every time a student calls me a "Bitch!" or tells me to go "Fuck off" there are consequences. "He/she is having a hard day," says my AP sheepishly,
Let us now show how little we care about the kids who come in willing to learn, respect adults, and want to graduate and become productive in our society.
"They'll be fine, right?"
Well, not really, because as it stands these students lose a lot of time to the clowns, and the "playas".
They fall behind when teachers find themselves having to repeat themselves because there are five kids in the back who couldn't care less and have no respect for themselves or anyone else, for that matter.
They lose a lot of time every time a fight breaks out in the classroom and the kids, having faced no consequences, are right back in the classroom to start another fight 10 minutes later.
You get the picture.
And now he will drastically reduce punishments!!!
And all in the name of Blacks and Latinos!!!
Kudos, Mr. Mayor, you have done it again. You are a brilliant man. Just like your take on cellphones in school (he believes kids should have them), you have no idea what is happening in our schools.
Are you letting your teenage son help you dictate policy? Sounds like it to me.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR WISDOM AND LEADERSHIP
Labels:
chancellor Farina,
de blasio,
DOE,
education,
NYC,
teachers,
unsatisfactory
Letter to Cuomo
If you are a NYS teacher or support the efforts of the educators in our state,
sign this letter. It will tell Governor Cuomo to open communications and
listen to what those who know education are saying.
I JUST DID.
Sunday, January 25, 2015
Just One More for Today
Labels:
big corporations,
Common Core,
Cuomo,
department of education,
DOE,
money,
parents,
politicians,
teachers
Monday, December 1, 2014
The Beginning
Rather than go through everything from the beginning, I decided to post some of the letters that I have sent regarding the issues that I was experiencing. Once I reach the present, I will keep a daily log.
I have deleted the names of the persons involved, for the moment, since I am still trying to make things work. By the way, none of these letters have in any way helped. In fact, none have received a response, but I keep trying.
The UFT has been of no help; everything that I have managed to get resolved has been because I refuse to let this principal continue to create her own laws and continue her power trip. She is drunk with it and anyone who dares to question her practices just gets in her way. And, they pay.
I am still paying.
It is the year 2014 and I am still awaiting a response to both these letters.
In my next post, I will share the letters I sent to the Chancellor. I actually just sent one to the new chancellor, two weeks ago. I haven't received ay correspondence.
I have deleted the names of the persons involved, for the moment, since I am still trying to make things work. By the way, none of these letters have in any way helped. In fact, none have received a response, but I keep trying.
The UFT has been of no help; everything that I have managed to get resolved has been because I refuse to let this principal continue to create her own laws and continue her power trip. She is drunk with it and anyone who dares to question her practices just gets in her way. And, they pay.
I am still paying.
2012
(Superintendent's name)
Superintendent District 12
Dear Superintendent,
I am writing to you because I don’t know where else to turn.
I am presently at (xxxx) High School under the supervision of (Principal's name). I have reached
out to her and she has told me that she cannot help me.
In July of 2011, I performed a demo lesson for Mr. (xxx), AP
and Mr. (xxx), English Teacher. That afternoon, I was offered the job of 9th
grade English teacher at the school. I was very excited because I had tried
teaching at the middle school level the year before, and realized that I
preferred teaching the older students.
I began in September teaching two English 1 classes, two
English skills classes and one Honor’s English class. I was very happy to be in
this school. The principal and AP seemed to be supportive and when it came to
discipline problems, they seemed to be on top of things. I was able to walk
into the Principal’s office and share my experiences and student work.
Everything was going well, until…
In October, the Principal and AP did a walk-through. That
afternoon, the Principal and AP sat with me for a post observation and
completely tore down my lesson. Not once did they say anything positive about
my lesson! As I tried to explain myself and how English lessons are taught,
they would hear nothing of it. I followed a lesson plan format that I have always used and the same one they hired me with. When I brought this to her attention she said, "No, here at (School name) we do things differently. You must follow the format we use and create a learning target and a criteria for success for every lesson."
I continued to express my thoughts and she said at one point, “You frustrate me!” All through the post ob, I was intimidated and
made to feel as if I didn't know what I was doing. (Principal) spoke to me
loudly and coarsely and then threatened me with a U as a final rating for the
year. She said that she would not recommend me for Tenure.
At this, I quizzically looked at her and said, “I have
tenure. What do you mean?” She became more upset and began saying how she was
not going to go through this again. “I just went through this with a teacher
who said she had tenure and she really didn't.”
After this meeting, I was told
to come back during my administrative period. I was so intimidated with our
first meeting that Mr. (English teacher) offered to go in with me for support.
When we
got to the door, she saw him and told him he couldn't stay. I expressed
that I just wanted him there for support. She said, “Absolutely not!!”
For the
next 40 minutes, I was intimidated, belittled, and treated as if I had no
knowledge of English and teaching. She said she was holding me responsible for
the kids who do not come to class and fail. I asked her for ideas on how I
could possibly do this and she told me to be creative and figure it out. But,
that she wanted to see those kids pass.
She sent me an email the next day. It was the Preliminary Recommendation page in the Tenure Notification
System. She didn't appoint me under my High School license. This is where I am
tenured. I explained this to her and she refused to acknowledge that a mistake
was made.
Since she was not willing to help me in this matter, I went
to the union. This is when things really went bad between (Principal) and me.
The union looked through the information and saw that a mistake was done. They
said that not only was I teaching out of license, but that the school is out of
compliance. They said (Principal) had two options: she could fix the mistake
or she could excess me. This is when everything really deteriorated. I passed
this information along to (Principal), who did not believe what I was saying
and continued to tell me that there was nothing she could do. These
conversations happened before the Christmas break.
I tried to go on with my week and tried to speak with the (Principal) regarding the license issue. I tried several times until I caught her
leaving her office and she told me that she had spoken to HR and they had said
that there was nothing they could do about it. So, I asked her to excess me.
She wrote me an email where she said that she understood if I wanted to go to
another place.
I have not found any openings.
Sincerely,
(Me)
Second letter:
New superintendent. (I have no idea what happened to the first!)
(Superintendent's name) 2013
Superintendent D. 12
Dear Mr. (Superintendent),
I am (Me). You
extended my probation recently. I am writing to you to make some matters clear
about me.
I am a High School
Tenured English teacher. I have been working for the DOE for 25 years. The bulk
of my HS experience was in (xx) HS under (Principal) and then, (Principal).
In the summer of 2009, I
went to Arizona for a year. When I came back, I was hired at (MS-HS in Bronx). I was offered the 9th grade ELA position but
in September I was told that I would be teaching 6th grade. When I expressed that this would affect my licensing (Principal) said she would have me on paper as the HS teacher since the 9th grade teacher was a MS license. I figured it would be okay.
In October, I found out
that she had not done this and suddenly I found myself on probation for MS
English. I reached out to several people including the union but to no avail.
However, I was told that once I got a job at the HS level things would be fine.
So, although I enjoyed
working with the kids and parents (one actually wrote a letter of commendation
to the Superintendent (xxx) and the Chancellor about me, I went on to the
Open Market and was hired by (present school). I explicitly told the AP,
(xxx) my situation and he said that there would be no issue and that I
would be appointed under the HS license. Of course, this makes sense because I
was hired by a HS.
On my first informal walk-through in September, it explicitly said on my report “Tenured”. So, I didn't give it another thought. However, during a walk-through that they deemed
“Unsatisfactory” I was threatened with a “U” rating because I was on probation.
I explained how that could not be possible and that it must be a mistake. (Principal) said it wasn't. I asked her several times to please change my
appointment to the proper license and she, on repeated occasions, told me she couldn't.
This began a series of
unannounced visits and several reprimands for a variety of things. I wrote to
the Superintendent at the time and she never responded. I involved the union
but to no avail.
I was running a Drama
Club after school and everything was fine. When I asserted myself regarding my
situation, I was told on several occasions to cut the session short and leave
the building. It happened so often that I finally cancelled the club. I was taken
out of a Computer lab where the kids worked on Achieve 3000 because
there were "claims" that my students were ruining the computers. And
so on.
Anyway, when I saw that
all my lessons were being ripped apart and that I was being singled out, I told
the Principal if she would release me or excess me. She said that she would not
stand in my way but that she would not excess me. I used all of the information
from NCLB and it didn't matter.
I continued to be made
to feel unwelcome at the school. When I was told that I would be getting
another “U”, I grieved it. During this grievance meeting, I broke down and told
(Principal and AP) how I felt. During this conversation, she made it
clear that she could have changed my appointment but that she didn't want to.
She wasn't sure if she wanted me in the school. However, I was reassured that I
would not be discontinued, but that a “U” was in my future. So I asked again
that I receive Pre and Post Observations, and I finally did. I received an S.
Then came a walk-through and again I received an S. (Principal) softened somewhat and actually started speaking to me and saying good morning. I thought
it was over.
Then came time for the
Tenure process and she said you advised her that my probation should be extended.
So, she told me she needed to observe me again. She walked in on April 26. She
saw the same elements for which I had been previously rated “S”. She rated the Walk-through “U”.
I am being scrutinized
and singled out. I come to work wondering what they will point out next.
Although they claim to merely suggest elements they want in a lesson, they
really expect them. I have incorporated everything they have asked of me and it doesn't matter. I learned an entirely new way of presenting the lesson using the
Learning Target and Criteria for Learning. Instead of seeing the progress, they focus on something else. They expect to see a group activity for every
single lesson. So, even though every lesson does not lend itself to this
practice, I reworked my lessons and do group and pair work. So now they find
faults in that. I introduced Accountable Talk; she criticized my last lesson
for too much accountable talk. They question the students and if one says they are
working independently, they use it against me. Some kids prefer to work
independently even when asked to pair up. That’s differentiation! Why am I
being rated unsatisfactorily?
I am so frustrated. I
get nervous every time they walk into my room. I feel harassed. I feel they are
setting me up to receive a “U” rating at the end of this year. I really feel
this is personal and I wish I didn't. I will go to another school, but who will
hire me with a “U”? And, I do not want to ruin my 25 years of satisfactory
service unfairly. What does this say of my former administrators who have, year
in and year out, rated me “S” and placed me in positions of leadership? I have
created curricula for electives, been a mentor, created programs and ran them
successfully. I have been a Peer Mediator for an entire school campus. It doesn't seem possible that I am in this situation!
I would like to meet
with you regarding my situation.
Sincerely,
(Me)
Labels:
abuse,
abuse of power,
ageism,
department of education,
discrimination,
DOE,
NYC,
principal,
racism,
teacher,
UFT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)